Here are 30 important and potentially confusing facts about Separation of Powers in India, which can help in your UPSC CSE preparation:
- Separation of Powers is a fundamental concept in modern democracies, ensuring that the powers and functions of government are divided into three distinct branches: Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary.
- The Indian Constitution adopts a separation of powers model, but with checks and balances between the three branches, rather than a strict separation, as seen in countries like the United States.
- The Legislature (Parliament) makes the laws, the Executive (President, Council of Ministers, and the bureaucracy) enforces the laws, and the Judiciary (courts) interprets and applies the laws.
- Article 50 of the Indian Constitution directs the state to take steps for the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive, emphasizing the independence of the Judiciary.
- The Indian Judiciary is independent of the Executive and Legislature, and this independence is guaranteed by the Constitution, specifically in Article 50 and Articles 121-231.
- The President of India, as the head of the Executive, is not a part of the Legislature in terms of making or enacting laws, but plays an important role in lawmaking, such as giving assent to bills.
- The Parliament, which consists of the Lok Sabha (House of the People) and Rajya Sabha (Council of States), is responsible for legislating and controlling finances, whereas the Executive implements the policies and decisions of the legislature.
- Judicial review is a mechanism by which the Judiciary can review the actions of the Legislature and the Executive to ensure they are constitutional, as upheld in Marbury v. Madison and applied in India through cases like Kesavananda Bharati.
- While the Executive can propose and implement laws, it cannot directly pass them; this function rests with the Legislature. The Executive may only issue ordinances under Article 123, but ordinances need to be ratified by the Parliament.
- The Indian Judiciary has the power of judicial review, which means it can strike down laws passed by the Legislature if they are deemed unconstitutional, as in Minerva Mills v. Union of India.
- Article 50 of the Constitution mentions the separation of the Judiciary from the Executive, but does not entirely prohibit the Executive from participating in judicial matters. For instance, judges are appointed by the President (Executive).
- Legislative power in India is vested in Parliament, which can make laws on matters listed in the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List. The Union has exclusive jurisdiction over matters in the Union List.
- The Executive implements laws passed by the Legislature and manages the day-to-day administration of government, ensuring that laws are effectively enforced.
- In the Indian system, the Judiciary not only resolves disputes but also protects fundamental rights. It can issue writs like habeas corpus and mandamus to uphold constitutional rights.
- The Legislature controls the finances of the state. The Budget is presented and passed by the Parliament, which exercises control over government spending, taxation, and loans.
- The Executive consists of the President, the Prime Minister, the Council of Ministers, and the bureaucracy. The President is the nominal executive, while real power rests with the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers.
- The Constitution does not establish a strict separation of powers but follows a system of checks and balances where each branch of government can check the others to maintain balance and prevent abuse of power.
- The President holds a ceremonial role as the head of the Executive. However, they do have significant powers in areas such as appointments (judges, governors), dissolving Parliament, and issuing ordinances.
- The Judiciary in India has the power to review the constitutionality of laws made by the Legislature. If a law is found unconstitutional, the Judiciary can strike it down.
- Article 121 prohibits discussion of the conduct of judges in the Legislature unless the Legislature is investigating an allegation of misbehavior or incapacity against a judge.
- The Council of Ministers is responsible for formulating policies, and the Prime Minister serves as the head of the Executive. The Prime Minister, however, must have the confidence of the Lok Sabha, which links the Legislature with the Executive.
- Article 110 specifies the procedure for money bills, which can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha (Lower House of Parliament). This gives the Legislature significant control over financial matters.
- Article 118 gives the Legislature the authority to make rules for its own procedure, including the management of debates and the passage of bills, giving Parliament autonomy in managing its own affairs.
- The Judiciary’s role in the separation of powers has expanded over time, especially through judicial activism, where the courts have stepped in to direct the Executive and Legislature on various policy matters.
- The Legislature can pass impeachment motions against the President (under Article 61), Judges (under Article 124), and even the Vice President (under Article 67B), thus providing a check on these branches.
- Article 143 gives the President the power to seek the opinion of the Supreme Court on any matter of law or fact, and it provides a mechanism for the Executive and Judiciary to interact.
- Article 123 grants the President the power to issue Ordinances when Parliament is not in session, which have the same force as laws passed by the Legislature. However, these ordinances must be ratified by Parliament within six weeks.
- The Legislature is responsible for enacting laws, but it is often the Judiciary that interprets those laws and gives them practical meaning, especially in cases of fundamental rights violations.
- The Doctrine of Separation of Powers is not absolute in India. In cases of emergency or national crisis, the Executive may assume more control, which has led to temporary suspensions of certain rights.
- The Constitution establishes that the Judiciary is the final arbiter in disputes between the Executive and Legislature. For instance, in cases of conflict over the scope of laws, the Supreme Court has the final say.
The concept of Separation of Powers in India is meant to balance the functioning of the Legislature, Executive, and Judiciary, ensuring that each branch has its own domain of authority but also providing for checks and balances to prevent misuse of power. Understanding this system is essential for grasping the structure and functioning of India’s government, a crucial topic for the UPSC CSE exam.